| Why Big Retail is in a Mess |
| Strategy - Marketing & Branding | |||||||
| Written by Aswathi Muralidharan | |||||||
| Friday, 01 May 2009 00:00 | |||||||
|
Page 2 of 2 Unmindful expansion strategy Till recently discount store Subhiksha, which is currently neck-deep in debt of more than Rs 750 crore, was reportedly planning to add two million sq ft by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009. On the contrary, the company has closed its 1,600 stores across 110 cities, with R Subramanian reportedly saying that his company owes Rs 45 crore to suppliers, Rs 20 crore to employees and Rs 24 crore as rentals for various stores! Subhiksha’s troubles started when it began expanding at a rate of 800 stores a year on debt capital. The situation is not very different with Reliance Retail, with rumors afloat that a number of stores have been shut and several employees have been sacked.
Sinha says, “Everybody is trying to give a good value to customers. However, the cost that is incurred in the process takes time to be re-couped. The market may not grow at that rate. What has happened is in the wake of growth is that players have focused on opening more stores than consolidating the older ones.” The process of expansion has to be supported with adequate funds, inventory, and service, which was clearly lacking in the case of Subhiksha. Does this mean that other retailers are also following the footsteps of Subhiksha in unmindful expansion? Customers unprepared? “The customers take time to migrate from these stores. Retail does not merely mean distribution. A lot of work has to happen before customers start patronizing the stores. And it takes time for customers to understand a lot of things like whether they are getting the right deal or not. You cannot ask customers to shift by giving them the lure of better environment. It is the value that one delivers overtime that drives consumers. That ensures whether the customer will stick to you or not,” says Sinha. No localized approach Freshness: A concern Home deliveries In-house brands vs private brands Comments (4)
![]() written by yadav chandna, November 01, 2009
Yet another tribute to the wisdom of the India's Aam Aadmi.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
written by M A J Jeyaseelan, October 31, 2009
Efficient distribution which includes retailing is an essential requirement fur upping the productivity bar. Nothing can eventually survive unless the concerned new activity results in a corresponding rise in the productivity of the economy
What the world is yet to understand the fine difference between a market opportunity and an economic opportunity. It is the lack of understanding of this basic concept that had plunged the world in to the abyss requiring so much of taxpayers money to pull the economies out of trouble. What most consultants, business associations, bankers, and venture capitalists have been focusing on in the retail sector is the market opportunity it offers. Consumers do want better retail services. That certainly presents a huge market opportunity. But the ultimate question that begs an answer is whether the big retail is able to provide these better services at a lower cost. Can the market opportunity be translated in to an economically viable opportunity. I do not see that happening yet. There are two parameters that do not at all permit any favourable forecast for retailers. 1) The land cost and the resultant commercial space cost. Both remain artificially high, thanks to the massive imperfections in the real estate market. The real estate market is being so unscrupulously manipulated by all and sundry making marginally more efficient services to cash in on any market opportunity. 2) Logistic quality and costs make cost efficient retail services almost impossible. There is no assured power supply. There is no cold chain infrastructure. Transportation remains a huge bottleneck. Most retailers are attempting adopt models that have worked in good quality logistics and low commercial space cost environments. Unless the government removes the imperfections in the real estate market and undertakes a crash program to improve logistics, the retail dream is only going to bleed. report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
written by Mahadevan Sundarraj, October 31, 2009
Very well written, but should have been timed earlier. I spoke about this in 2007, and found very few takers. A link to that presentation written in Dec 2007 titled "Myths in Food retailing" is available at http://www.collabrant.in/content/Overseas Management Partners in India.htm
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment
|
For Branded Items the retail-chain stores may be giving discounts but not in the case of in-house brands / unpopular brands.
For example, I was purchasing in Spencers/Reliance Fresh/Heritage stores, but for items like sugar, oils, some not-so-popular company items are priced more than my round-the-corner super store.
It is really foolish to go for these super stores thinking that we get discounts.
Once I saw a reliance fresh guy throwing out two/three sack full of vegetables as all of them got perished out and was a stock being received. This clearly tells the freshness of the vegetables/fruits being sold. and their understanding of the products/preservation requirements.