DARE - Because Entrepreneurs Do

Saturday, May 26th

You are here: Strategy Business Essentials Flexi-timings and startups
Follow us on Twitter

Flexi-timings and startups

User Rating: / 5
PoorBest 

Given tight budgets and low headcounts, flexi-timings are not a great idea for startups

The debate over the pros and cons of a nine-to-five job vis-à-vis flexible timings is an old one. 

Several large organizations in India, including IT majors, consumer goods behemoths, and consultancy firms, have been offering flexible working hours to their employees as part of their retention policies and with the belief that it increases productivity. Large corporations have the wherewithal to implement such policies. Can startups do that too? If it works well for big companies, can it deliver same results for small businesses?

Chetna Manglik, Regional Head (North) of PlugHR, an HR consultancy firm, shares the experience of a client who had to withdraw flexi-timings from its system as it created a lot of ‘confusion and contradiction’. She says that flexi-timings are usually helpful in a company where an employee is given individual targets to achieve. However, in the case of a group, it doesn’t work that well because somebody might come in early, while others late. “So in that case there is a communication gap, and as a team, they might get only three or four hours together. Hence, the whole idea of teamwork is defeated,” she adds. And since teamwork is vital for a startup trying to create a foothold in the market, the idea of flexible work hours may actually backfire.

The cost factor
Another reason why the company in the foregoing example chose to do away with the system was the resultant increase in costs. At a time when companies are adopting Darwinian tactics to dodge the effects of recession, this system may burn a hole in their pocket. Giving the benefit of flexi-timing to employees means the office has to remain open beyond the normal working hours. This translates into increased costs in terms of electricity used for lighting, air-conditioners, and servers. Also, one needs to have additional resources such as an HR person, an admin person, security, etc. to manage employees.

Manglik says some companies provide commuting facilities to their employees. When it is a big firm, even if 50 people opt for flexi-timing, it may be just 1 percent of the workforce. So for 50 people buses could be arranged. But in a startup there might be 50 people in total, and even if five opt for flexi-timing, it does not work as one might need to arrange separate cabs. Hence, the costs keep rising. She adds, “And if you do not provide this facility, it becomes a contradictory situation since the number of hours they are putting in is the same as other employees.”

Employee management
Besides these, you might need to hire an additional resource just to manage and monitor these employees, and also to track their in and out time. If you are a company that deals with providing services, this practice may not be beneficial. For example, if a restaurant or hotel employees are allowed flexi-timings, it is quite possible that without proper supervision, there may be times when there are no employees working during some hours. This might give the business a bad image.

What is Flexi-timing?
It is the option to allow employees to work for a specified number of hours per day between office hours that are decided by the employer. This means that the in time and out time depend on the employee.
What are the disadvantages for startups?
  • Is not applicable in all industries/jobs
  • Costs escalate
  • Affects teamwork
  • Monitoring employee output is difficult

Tracking employee output
Opting for flexi-timings requires a robust tracking system to monitor employee output, which means additional costs yet again. According to Animesh Dasgupta, Practice Head, Executive Access, flexi-timings work best for higher level employees. He says, “It requires maturity on the part of employees and understanding of the assignments from end to end. It can be built in organizations where the employees understand the significance of their outputs, which is very important.”

No for all Industries/job roles
In India it is mostly IT and consulting firms that have opted for flexi-timings. Explains Manglik, “It does not work well for companies that deal with machine-driven work; It only works for companies that are into mind-driven work.” Dasgupta agrees:“Flexi-timings prevail in sales jobs, especially field sales, which depend on the customer’s timings.” Another area where this is being practiced is in project-based work. Here, the employee timings are decided according to the project consultants’ timings.

Size of the firm
Flexi-timings work better for bigger firms, as they can afford to cough up the extra money required for additional resources. Says Dasgupta, “Big companies have the infrastructure to monitor employees. Flexi-timing is good only where the output is measurable, and big companies have the leisure of doing so.” Not only this, a startup has to have a higher employee utilization rate compared to bigger organizations. In companies that opt for flexi-timings, employee utilization is around 60 to 70 percent, while a smaller company has to have the maximum utilization of the skills of its employees. Therefore, this may actually prove to be disastrous in the long run for startups and smaller companies.

Comments (6)Add Comment
part time jobs in Coimbatore
written by surabhi, June 22, 2010
This is nice informative article. I am from a city of tamilnadu and seeking part time jobs in Coimbatore
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by jaco, September 04, 2009
I believe that in many of the Indian cos, Private - PSU - Govt, Some people work and others don't. And those who work generaly work flexitime. But here the word has a different meaning. They work the scheduled 8 hours and put in as much time as is needed ignoring most of their social responsibilities or getting sick and continuing on prescriptions.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Flexi-timing only works for Large companies is not true!
written by Anthony Balraj, September 03, 2009
I agree with Mr.Shyman Unnithan completely. It is not about an organisation being big or small. It is got more to do with the nature of work within the organisation. For example, in a small company where orders fluctuate on a daily or monthly basis, flexi-time are highly suitable and even recommended, because it gives the employees the responsibility and the freedom of putting in extra hours to complete order commitments and thereby increase the companies profitability for that period, and then compensate themselves for those extra hours/days in periods where workloads are lower.
Of course this works only with a high degree of maturity on the part of the employees and the trust of the management on the employees deliverability.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Employers not adaptable enough to this concept!
written by Manali Rohinesh, July 27, 2009
This article rightly points out how only some industries can implement this system. What's puzzling me is that how come the media industry hasn't adopted it because journalists can and do work according to a timeline and if parameters are set down clearly..this can be done in this particular sector. As for the rationale of increasing costs - there are any number of time-wasters who who only come to work to use the free internet and telephone services on a 9-5 setup and someone who comes in a few hours a day will probably get more done because he/she values time and is possibly a more efficient, honest employee with better time management skills and therefore will provide a degree of higher-end, professional service. After all, only a few months back MSN had published a story where it categorically mentioned that almost 80% of employees are unproductively employed!

After dropping out of the full-time job scenario voluntarily, the only part-time or flexi-time options I was offered were as secretary/BPO worker/LIC/MF agent and other such similar positions. What a bore! The media sector is just not forward-looking and smart enough to hire the right people and fire the lightweights on their payroll who just occupy space - full-time - in their offices. I've been there and seen it all.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
Relaxation Time rather than Flexi time
written by Chetna , July 24, 2009
In such scenario where employee needs to stretch himself for even 10 or more, organization can have a “Relax Timing” Policy to give some relaxation in the reporting time. But Flexi timing give flexibility to an employee to choose his reporting time irrespective of what time he leaves.
People join startup for fast growth, challenge, recognition etc, but I think flexi timing will be the last option they will have to join or stick to a start-up
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Tehnology Startups cannot restrict flexi timings
written by Shyam Unnithan, July 13, 2009
I accept almost all the facts here accept for the last one Size of the firm. My observation is regarding technology startups. In case of technology startups "Flexi-Timings" are one of the benefits which could be a lucrative offering for prospective employees. It would be difficult for startups to offer the kind of salaries which are being offered by bigger firms, but there are always some things which can be added to employee benefits which are not available elsewhere. I also believe that in a startup, you would end up hiring all responsible people, who really share the kind of vision you have, since it doesn’t make sense if the people you are working with work for 9 hrs, as they would in any other company. On an odd day, they might have to stretch themselves up to 16 hrs if required and I would say if such individuals are denied the privilege of having flexi timings, they would definitely end up working somewhere else rather than your startup.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy