There are various funding sources in the government that serve to fund the various stages of new venture development. Based on their function and utility, these funding sources have been broadly categorized into six categories:
- Technology Development Funds: Technology development funds are aimed at supporting work on early stage technology idea development, validation, demonstration of proof of concept. These funds come in the form of grants or soft loans, and the funding could range from Rs. 75,000 to Rs. 10 Crore. This stage of venture creation comes with high risk, and typically private players (VCs, Angles) and banks don’t fund startups at this stage. The wide availability of government funding will go a long way in promoting innovation and high-risk (and high-payoff) ventures. There are several seed funds connected to business incubators that offer funding at this stage, and could offer an alternate source for entrepreneurs. Some examples of such incubator-related seed funds are SINE (IIT-B), Center for Innovation and Incubation and Entrepreneurship (IIM-A) and SIDBI Innovation and Incubation Center (IIT-K).
- Funds for patent protection and Technology In-licensing: Protecting technology and knowhow from competitors is crucial, particularly if you want to shield yourself from your competitors, and exclude them from practicing your art. Patenting is an expensive process, in India, and more so, if international patents are to be obtained. Sometimes, filing for patents is prohibitively expensive for an entrepreneur (on average, US patent costs over $5,000 to obtain, and additional expenditure to maintain it). Without patents, the start-up venture risks to lose its competitive edge. The funds under this category help entrepreneurs to file for patent protection. Also, in some cases, where additional licenses have to be obtained to run a business, and it is necessary to procure IP from other sources (in-licensing), it is possible using these funds (listed in the accompanying table).
- Technology scale-up/validation/de-risking funds: There are various risks that are associated with any early-stage technology venture such as technology risk, which is the risk that the technology might fail or might not deliver the desired product with required specifications, market acceptability risk, which is the risk that the products won’t gain acceptability in the market. So, to gain wider acceptance and get funding from other sources like the VCs or angels, it is necessary to de-risk or prove that your technology works and the product is accepted in the market. Various organizations such as DSIR, NRDC, SIDBI provide funding to validate the technology and de-risk the new venture. There are specialized funds that support venture that emphasize new and renewable energy (see table).
- Market entry funds: These funds support the technology entrepreneur in performing a range of market entry activities, technology upgradation, infrastructure development etc. This is the stage when the new venture needs to boost its payroll by hiring marketing professionals and a host of other persons to expand the scale of operations. Typically, at this stage, it shouldn’t be difficult to get the attention of VCs and Angles and other investors, as the venture by this stage has significantly de-risked. There are excellent networks of Angel investors in the country (see table) and VCs who could be tapped to provide funding by taking equity in the company. Grassroots innovators should definitely note the role played by National Innovation Foundation (NIF) in funding and promoting ventures in this area.
- Expansion funds: At this stage, major fund infusion is needed for sustaining a new venture. Presumably, at this stage, the technology has been successfully demonstrated and there is a growing need for the product in the market. To quickly achieve economies of scale and serve the growing markets, quick and massive infusions of funds are necessary. The funding sources listed below are the ones to look to at this stage. As can be noted from the table below, these sources offer large amounts to technology start-ups. The sources range from state government ventures (KITVEN, KVCF) to VCs to central government ministries.
| Technology Scale-up/Validation Funds | ||
| Organization | Scheme | Funding Amount |
| Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR) | Phase I: TePP Project Fund (TPF) | Rs. 15,00,000 subject to 90% of total project cost |
| Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR) | International Technology Transfer Programme (ITTP) | Up to Rs 1 crore sanctioned in recent projects |
| Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) | SME Growth Fund | Rs 2 crore to Rs 25 crore |
| National Research Development Corporation (NRDC) | Angel Fund | Rs 10 Lakh to Rs 30 Lakh |
| Department of Information Technology (DIT) | Multiplier Grants Scheme | upto Rs 2 crore or upto Rs 4 crore depending on the industry, R&D lab partnership |
| National Innovation Foundation (NIF) | Micro Venture Innovation Fund (MVIF) | up to Rs 10-15 Lakhs |
| Ministry of New and Renewable Energy | Energy Recovery from Urban Wastes | Rs 1.5 crore / MW for setting up power plants/ Other schemes available |
| Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) | New Millennium Indian Technology Leadership Initiative (NMITLI) | Grants for Public Institutions and Soft Loan for Private Sector Companies. Few Crore Rs. |
Conclusion
Technology entrepreneurs could enormously benefit from utilizing the funding opportunities offered by the government to run their new ventures. Government funding sources are particularly useful in the early-stages of a startup, as private investors and VCs and angles will be wary of investing in a venture with high level of built-in risk. It might be difficult to run a new venture based on government grants and loans. But, any entrepreneur who understands the government funding landscape can use the funding sources to augment his funds and stands a much greater chance of success in running his technology venture.
| Expansion Funds | ||
| Organization | Scheme | Funding Amount |
| Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) | SME Growth Fund | Rs 2 crore to Rs 25 crore |
| Karnataka Information Technology Venture Capital Fund (KITVEN) | KITVEN Fund -2 | Rs 1 crore to Rs 2.5 Crore |
| Kerala Venture Capital Fund | KVCF | Rs 25 Lakh to Rs 1.75 Crore |
| Ministry of Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MoMSME) | Credit Guarantee Fund Scheme for Micro and Small Enterprises | Collateral Free Credit upto Rs 50 Lakh |
| Ministry of Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MoMSME) | Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme (CLCSS) | Loans upto Rs 1 crore, upfront capital subsidy upto 15% for technology upgradation |
| Venture Capitalists | 1) Indian Venture Capital Association (IVCA)
2) SEBI List of VCs in India |
Rs 5 crore and above |
| Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) | Direct Finance | Rs 10 Lakh and above |
Note: Due to space restrictions, only a partial list of the government funding sources is given in this article. A more elaborate list with helpful details and tips for entrepreneurs can be found at http://www.venturecenter.co.in/funding/funding.php
| Market Entry Funds | ||
| Organization | Scheme | Funding Amount |
| Ministry of Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MoMSME) | Marketing Assistance Scheme | Up to Rs 5 Lakh support for attending domestic and International exhibitions etc |
| Department of Bio-Technology (DBT) | Small Business Innovation Business Research Initiative (SBIRI) Phase 1/Phase 2 | Upto Rs 1 Crore, upto Rs 50 Lakh as grant and rest as soft loan/Soft Loan upto Rs 10 Crores |
| National Research Development Corporation (NRDC) | Angel Fund | Rs 10 Lakh to Rs 30 Lakh |
| Department of Information Technology (DIT) | R&D Projects Funding | Not mentioned, Industry will get upto 50% of project cost |
| National Innovation Foundation (NIF) | Micro Venture Innovation Fund (MVIF) | up to Rs 10-15 Lakhs |
| Karnataka Information Technology Venture Capital Fund (KITVEN) | KITVEN Fund -2 | Rs 1 crore to Rs 2.5 Crore |
| Kerala Venture Capital Fund | KVCF | Rs 25 Lakh to Rs 1.75 Crore |
| Angel Networks | 1) Indian Angel Network 2) Mumbai Angels |
Rs 50 Lakh to Rs 5 Crore |
| Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) | Direct Finance | Rs 10 Lakh and above |
Magesh Nandagopal is Scientist, NCL Innovations, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune
email:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Vibhor Jindaland is Consultant, Venture Center, NCL Innovations Park,Dr. Homi Babha Road, Pune
V. Premnath is Head, NCL Innovations, National Chemical Laboratory, Pune and Founding Director at Venture Center, Pune

written by Detroit, September 11, 2010
written by I.V.SUBBA RAO, August 16, 2010
RAGHUVAMSI IRON ORE PELLETZATION TECHNOLOGIES (GREEN FIELD PROJECT) SEEKING FOR INVESTORS
GOOD MORNING, I am I.V. SUBBA RAO, I have developed advanced new technology, it is named as iron ore pellitization.. Still it is not introduced in India for small medium and major sponge iron manufacturing industries.
We are planning to set up 50 T.P.D Commercial production plant, its cost is 24 Cores, but we are not financially sound enough. We have applied for patent rights on JULY 2007, regarding this technology so many domestic and other country small scale sponge iron manufactures are contacting through mails and through phones. Lot of customers is interesting to utilize our technology, while before that they want to see the operation plant.
If I set up 50 TPD plant i.e., both ways it is like to pellet plant as well as commercial production plant. If any one help for us financial loan of Rs 24. 0 Cores (Indian currency). I will set up the plant as early as possible (6.0 to 9.0months).
After starting the commercial production we will start clearing ours loan immediately, other wise if want sponge iron material we will supply the material (just like barter system).
Through this technology small, medium and major sponge iron manufacturing industries (Karnataka, Orissa, Jharkand, Chatisgarh, West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh) can use this iron ore power easily. Because of this technology sponge iron and steel manufactures can get lot of marzines / profits, the Indian Sponge Iron /DRI Economic growth turn over gone up to 50,000 Cores per annum.
This product (fines using) is burning problem of India and aboard for sponge iron and steel manufactures. This is unique technology; I have received so many mails with in short time in India and abroad. If any one can give me an appointment I will meet you and explain all other details.
After starting the commercial production we will start clearing ours loan immediately, other wise if want sponge iron material we will supply the material (just like barter system).
But I can not show you any security like property or any other documents.
I am waiting for your early response.
PERSONNEL NOTE: - OUR PATENT IS UNDER PENDING.
Thanking you,
RAGHUVAMSI TECHNOLOGIES
Ho.No.14-5-11.
OPP.BATCHU SRI DEVI HOUSE
SHIVALAYAM STREET
PEDDAPURAM
PIN:-533 437
ANDHARA PREDESH
INDIA-533437.
MOB:-09490188826
written by Reuben Dantes, July 08, 2010
written by Jim Benson, June 14, 2010
written by Roy Sochan, June 10, 2010
I looked at the company and I see they are in Luxembourg with a couple of offices in other countries, such as Russia. Sow how could they help us in India?
written by Jim benson, June 05, 2010
written by Satish Pathak, April 01, 2010
written by Abhinav, March 22, 2010
written by animesh kumar, February 19, 2010
written by M A J Jeyaseelan, January 19, 2010
Every innovator has to protect his innovation while trying to get it funded. We therefore an independent commission which can arrange to evaluate technologies by pooling together relevant experts and getting technologies evaluated in camera with due non disclosure agreements in place.
Most of the time those who evaluate technologies on behalf of VCs or Govt Agencies are management or financial experts who have no idea of the commercial potential of new technologies
Also most technology evaluations are done mainly from a short term financial perspective.
A country that wishes to promote innovation must first learn to evaluate technologies from technology perspective first. This is where our promotional schemes are woefully inadequate.
While someone claiming to produce petrol out of water might get overnight publicity, there is no place where a genuine innovator can get his technology claims independently evaluated.
written by Abhinav, January 18, 2010
I had quit my job last year to pursue my entrepreneurial dream. Much of my savings have been spent on marketing studies for my venture and my parents are taking care of my expenses now.
I would like to ask the DARE magazine to put some more research before they actually write something about any such govt funding.
written by Bhavesh Bati, December 10, 2009
Thank You...
written by sandeep sharma, December 08, 2009
Second aspect is have you seen how do people work in such institutions - avoiding their sleep, working day and night, no holidays, no diwali or holi or christmas, 24X7 active, leaving their family but with utter motivation, nothing else. Though it is not to be mentioned but just to clear the clouds.
It is true that lack of fund has hampered many of the initiatives which could be pursued otherwise. But this is what it is. Only the pressure from knowledge society may sensitise Government towards knowledge holders and it will happen at any cost, if not now, maybe 5yrs, 10yrs down the line. Innovation and Inclusive development are the key towards a sustainable economy and every country needs to resort to these now or in future when more touch times are awaited.
written by anil k gupta, December 07, 2009
as regards innovations by NIF, i think the fact it has scouted through Honey bee network more ideas, traditional knowledge practices ( not all unique), innovations and children creativity than any other program in post independence history of the country ( in fact the world should hold it in good standing. But criticism on account of doling out small grants is valid and absolutely correct. keep it up
written by Vikram S Puri, December 06, 2009
Apart from the starting disadvantage of very low funding assistance, the process itself is mired in bureaucracy and babudom. An analysis of how many applications have been received, processed and accepted will reveal the true and correct picture.
Agencies like the Technology Development Board are best place to really jumpstart innovation in India but alas, see the implementation of their own policies as an impediment to their calm and ineffective existence.
Till the time the government can see its way to more transparency, more participation by private and ngo associations for industry and and interaction platform, these schemes will remain what they are today - peanuts for monkeys.
Its easy to criticise without offering a solution - here are some simple possibilities that can possibly be implemented without too much effort or rancor:
A clear policy, an example of previously funded projects and their track record published on the net, availability of members of the decision making committee for one-on-one meetings / video / internet conferences are some easy ways forward.
The Indian Entrepreneur has many things to contend with, many fires to fight and many hills to climb - it would help if the stepladders provided by the government were to be reliable, consistent and dependable.
written by A.S.Rao, December 05, 2009
written by M A J Jeyaseelan, December 05, 2009
What is clearly implied is that if you are an innovator, you must first think of an idea that can be commercialized within these funding limits. Are these people living in the real world. Do they know what it takes to develop, prototype, test and commercialize any innovative technology. No doubt, the schemes of the Department of Biotechnology seem more realistic. Does the country need innovative technologies only in the biotechnology sector. What about innovations in other sectors. Just because, we have already a few big companies operating in sectors like software, pharmaceuticals, etc. do we want to shut out innovations in these areas?
Look at the innovation database of the National Innovation Foundation. It is plain pathetic. I do not think anyone who looks at the database would ever be enthused to take up the innovation challenge.
As Ravi has pointed out all our innovation initiatives are a crying shame. Let me give you my own example. I have been working on a software innovation in the area of database technology for many years and finally managed to commercialize it last year. It has cost me about Rs. 2.5 Crore. I would spend about a crore more in the marketing exercise. Of course I believed in the power of my idea. So put all my Rs 35 Lakh of Provident Fund as the initial capital and then used commercial revenues earned from initial innovation to support follow up innovation activities.
I am not complaining. But the question the country must ask itself is : Should every innovator risk his life's savings to make innovations work.
written by Maj Gen Pinak Pani Das, December 05, 2009
contact at 01126124216 for inputs.
written by Ravi, December 04, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
- How to get money to start a new business
- Direct Taxes Code: Revised discussion paper clears the air
- Can Mumbai be the next financial capital of the world
- The basics of credit rating
- What’s the Option: Debt or Equity for your Business?
- 20 things that improve your chances for loan or equity funding












We offer you a new innovative product - the solar cells with an
efficiency of 35%.
We developed the technology and began to produce solar Cell 156 mm
with an efficiency of 35%. Notify your email address we will send you
a presentation of technology, photography and performance. My e-mail:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
The basis of the invention are:
1. Synthesis of a truly amorphous silicon having particle size of
10-50 nano metr
2. several layers of transparent coating on the surface of mono
silicon Cell truly amorphous silicon with the inclusion of certain
materials (know how)
The characteristics of our products:
Specification
Dimension :156mm x 156mm ± 0.5mm
Thickness :203 mc.m ± 0,5 mc.m, 180 mc.m ± 0,5 mc.m
Front :2.0 ± 0.1mm busbar (silver)
Silicon nitride antireflection coating
Back 3.0mm continuous soldering pads (silver)
Back surface field (aluminum)
Efficiency - 35%
Power :5,8 watt to 6,5 watt)
Color uniformity A, grade
Price basis-CIF -4,7 $ Cell
Information needed to pay for samples:
1. If awake to buy standard packing (we have sent you its photo) that
in it holds 1000 Cell 156x156 mm (10 packings on 100 Сell).
2. If you awake to pay standard packing - 1000 Cell cost of the goods
taking into account delivery by plane will be - 5 500$. The size of a
box 800х800х300 mm. The weight of the goods taking into account
packing will make -15 kg.
3. Ladies and Gentlemen, you can pay by transferring the samples of
TT, for the preparation of accounts for payment please let us
information about your company
Spend a payment through Western Union:
Receiver: Surname -KARASEV , Name-VLADIMIR
City - CHELYABINSK
Country - RUSSIA
We invite you to promptly provide us a copy of payment document and
address for delivery of samples
general director SOLARUS ENERGY Ltd
VLADIMIR KARASEV
Address:
City: Chelyabinsk RUSSIA
Zip: 454080
Country: Phone: 7 919 4026295
Fax: 7 3517 41 43 49
Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it